UC Davis
Men - Women
2015 - 2016 - 2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
527  Julia Lemak FR 20:58
631  Hannah Kirkegaard SR 21:07
746  Kristen Leung FR 21:15
902  Nicole Lane SR 21:26
1,067  Haley Adel FR 21:36
1,121  Megan MacGregor SO 21:40
1,206  Sarah Anderson FR 21:45
1,345  Katherine Gallaher SO 21:53
1,373  Clara Macleod SR 21:54
1,708  Brynna Thigpen JR 22:15
2,253  Olivia Goins SR 22:50
2,866  Emily Antonino FR 23:53
National Rank #136 of 344
West Region Rank #22 of 39
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 15th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 92.6%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Julia Lemak Hannah Kirkegaard Kristen Leung Nicole Lane Haley Adel Megan MacGregor Sarah Anderson Katherine Gallaher Clara Macleod Brynna Thigpen Olivia Goins
CXC West Region Preview 10/01 1164 20:57 21:08 21:50 21:45 22:02 22:44 21:23 22:22 22:30
ISU adidas Pre Nationals (White) 10/15 1224 21:16 21:27 21:42 21:33 22:56
Santa Clara Bronco Invitational 10/15 1323 21:58 22:06 22:00 23:23
Big West Championship 10/29 1113 20:58 20:58 21:45 21:08 21:39 21:16 21:19 21:39 22:26
West Region Championships 11/11 1174 21:37 21:05 21:30 21:18 21:39 21:21





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 16.0 522 0.9 3.6 11.4 16.7 18.2 13.0 10.0 8.8 5.7 4.6 3.0 2.4 0.7 0.9 0.3 0.2 0.1



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Julia Lemak 84.4
Hannah Kirkegaard 93.1
Kristen Leung 102.5
Nicole Lane 115.9
Haley Adel 130.3
Megan MacGregor 135.6
Sarah Anderson 141.9




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 0.9% 0.9 11
12 3.6% 3.6 12
13 11.4% 11.4 13
14 16.7% 16.7 14
15 18.2% 18.2 15
16 13.0% 13.0 16
17 10.0% 10.0 17
18 8.8% 8.8 18
19 5.7% 5.7 19
20 4.6% 4.6 20
21 3.0% 3.0 21
22 2.4% 2.4 22
23 0.7% 0.7 23
24 0.9% 0.9 24
25 0.3% 0.3 25
26 0.2% 0.2 26
27 0.1% 0.1 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0